Colon Targeted Drug Delivery System of Prednisolone by Press Coating Technique: Effect of Different Grades of Hydroxyethylcellulose in Coat.

 

R.J. Garala*, S.V. Shirolkar, A.D. Deshpande and A.D. Kulkarni

Dept. of Pharmaceutics, Dr. D.Y.Patil Institute of Pharmaceutical sciences and Research, Pimpri, Pune - 411018.

*Corresponding Author E-mail: rjgarala22@gmail.com

 

ABSTRACT:

Press-coated tablets are able to release the core drug after of lag time and have potential for colon targeted drug delivery based on gastrointestinal transit time concept. This study investigated the factors influencing in vitro release characteristics of model drug prednisolone from press coated tablets. Prednisolone is a poorly water soluble drug having pH-independent solubility. Solubility enhancement of prednisolone with hydroxypropyl β-cyclodextrin (HP β-CD) was studied by phase solubility analysis. HP β-CD increased solubility of prednisolone. Phase solubility studies suggested that 1:2 complex of prednisolone-HP β-CD was formed. A physical mixture of prednisolone and HP β-CD was incorporated in core tablet. The core tablet, prepared by a direct compression method, was designed to disintegrate and release drug quickly. To prepare press coated tablets, 50 % of coating polymer was first, followed by centering the core tablet and compressing with remaining 50 % of the coating polymer. Effect of Natrosol viscosity grades (Natrosol L, M and HHX), weight of Natrosol coating, different weight ratios of Natrosol-HHX: Natrosol M and different weight ratios of Natrosol-L: Natrosol M on the lag time of drug release was studied. The lag phase was markedly dependent on the weight ratios of Natrosol-HHX: Natrosol M or Natrosol-L: Natrosol M in coat. Larger coating weight of Natrosol M produced larger coating thickness around core tablet, which resulted in increased lag time and decreased drug release. Different lag times of the press-coated tablets from 2 to 9.5 hours could be modulated by changing the type and amount of Natrosol. Natrosol of higher viscosity (Natrosol HHX) provide better protection of the drug containing core, showing increased lag time and slower drug release. Incorporating low viscosity polymer (Natrosol-L) in coat leads to decrease in lag time and rapid drug release. The results indicate that Natrosol M coated tablet formulation is more suitable for transit (5.5 hrs) through stomach and small intestine and faster release of drug in colon.

 

KEYWORDS: Colon targeted drug delivery, Press coating, Phase solubility analysis, Nastrosol M, Nastrosol-L and Nastrosol-HHX.

 


 

INTRODUCTION:

Targeting active drug molecule to colon is highly desirable in the treatment of colonic disorders like ulcerative colitis, crohn's disease, infectious diseases and colon cancer whereby high local concentration can be achieved with reduced side effects. To achieve successful colonic delivery, a drug needs to be protected from absorption and/or the environment of the upper gastrointestinal tract (GIT) and then be abruptly released into the proximal colon, which is considered the optimum site for colon-targeted delivery of drugs. There are various approaches have been developed and studied in order to achieve colonic drug release. These approaches rely on gastrointestinal pH, transit time, microbial flora and luminal pressure for site-specific delivery.

 

At present, Time-dependent formulations are designed to release drug load after a predetermined lag time (5-6 hrs), which is based on transit time of drug through stomach and small intestine. A nominal lag time of 5 or 6 hours is incorporated into the delivery system on the assumption that this is the time required for the dosage form to reach the colon.1, 2.

 

Prednisolone, a typical glucocorticoid, acts specifically on the inflammatory sites and decrease inflammation. Glucocorticoids are naturally occurring hormones that prevent or suppress inflammation and immune responses when administered at pharmacological doses. They induce the lipocortin-1 synthesis (Phospholipase A2 inhibitory proteins collectively called lipocortins), which then binds to cell membranes, preventing the phospholipase A2 from coming into contact with its substrate arachidonic acid. This leads to diminished eicosanoid production. The cyclooxygenase (both COX-1 and COX-2) expression is also suppressed, potentiating the effect. It is drug of choice for inflammatory conditions like ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. Prednisolone has many side effects in upper gastrointestinal tract. So there is need to develop drug delivery system for Prednisolone, which can release the drug in colon, and to achieve highest local concentration and minimize systemic side effects. Prednisolone is a poorly water soluble drug having pH-independent solubility. So it is required to enhance its solubility.

 

Press coating is an accepted pharmaceutical manufacturing technique because of its many advantages such as low labor and energy requirements, and use of nonsolvent processes. Recently, this technique has been applied to prepare different solid dosage forms, such as fast-disintegrating tablets or controlled-release preparations. Time-controlled release preparations have been extensively developed to achieve time- and/or site-specific release. An attempt has been made to develop colon targeted press coated Prednisolone tablets capable of releasing drug only after a well lag time dependent on the outer coating composition and thickness of polymer.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Materials:

Prednisolone was obtained from Naprod Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai as a gift. Natrosol M, Natrosol L, Natrosol HHX were supplied by Signet Chemical Corporation, Mumbai as free sample. Croscarmellose Sodium (Ac-Di-Sol®), microcrystalline cellulose (Avicel PH 101®), magnesium stearate and Hydroxypropyl β-cyclodextrin (HP-β-CD) were denoted by Cadila Healthcare Ltd., Ahmedabad, India.

 

Methods:

Phase solubility studies3, 4:

Drug-hydroxypropyl β-cyclodextrin (HP β-CD) interactions in solution were investigated by the phase solubility analysis. An excess of drug was added to 10 ml of HP β-CD aqueous solutions (0.00-0.009 mol L–1) in conical flasks and shaken at 37۫0C for 72 hours in orbital shaking incubator. At equilibrium after 3 days, aliquots were withdrawn, filtered through Whatman filter paper (N0. 41) and absorbances were measured at wavelength 248.0 nm spectrophotometrically. The apparent stability constant of the prednisolone- hydroxypropyl β-cyclodextrin (HP β-CD) complex was calculated from the phase-solubility diagram,

 

               Slope

Kc = -----------------

          S0 (1 – Slope)

Where, Kc is the stability constant (binding constant) (M-1), slope is obtained from the linear relationship between the concentration of prednisolone and hydroxypropyl β-cyclodextrin (HP β-CD) and S0 is intrinsic solubility of prednisolone. Each experiment was carried out in triplicate.

 

Preparation of core tablets:

The core tablet was prepared by direct compression method. Prednisolone (5 mg/tablet) & Hydroxypropyl β-Cyclodextrin (HP β-CD) (18.56 mg/tablet) were dry blended first for 15 minutes followed by the addition of Avicel PH 101 ®, Ac-Di-Sol® and magnesium stearate (0.75 mg).The all ingredients were blended further for 10 minutes. The resulting powder mixtures were then compressed into tablets (75 mg/tablet weight) using a rotary tablet machine equipped with 6 mm concave punch. The table 1 gives the details of core tablets formulations. The core tablets were evaluated for thickness, hardness, weight variation, friability and drug content or physical properties.

 

Table 1: Composition of core tablets with varying contents of Ac-Di-Sol®and Avicel PH 101®.

Ingredients

Quantity (mg)  in each Tablet

G1

G2

G3

G4

G5

Prednisolone

5

5

5

5

5

Hydroxypropyl

β-Cyclodextrin (HP β-CD)

-

18.56

18.56

18.56

18.56

Avicel PH 101®

69.25

49.94

49.19

48.44

47.69

Ac-Di-Sol®

0

0.75

1.5

2.25

3

Magnesium stearate (1%)

0.75

0.75

0.75

0.75

0.75

Total weight (mg)

75

75

75

75

75

 

Preparation of press coated tablets:

All excipients were previously passed through the sieve no. 44 and 75 mg of coating was used for the upper and lower shell. In Formulation R4 and R5 have 50 and 100 mg coating was used respectively. The press coating of tablet was performed using a rotary tablet machine. A half amount of the powder was filled into the die to make a powder bed, on the center of which the core tablet was placed manually. Then, the remaining half of the coating material filled in the die, and the contents were compressed under a sufficient compression force, using a concave punch 8 mm in diameter to get the hardness of 7-8 kg/cm2 for press coated tablet5,6,7. The formulations of tablets with their codes are listed in Table 2, 3, 4 and 5.

 

 

Table 2: Coating with various grades of Natrosol.

Formulations

Coating Material

Amount used       in  upper and lower  shell (mg)

Code

Core Tablet

Grade

Viscosity

( cps )

R1

G5

Natrosol M

1500-2500

At 1%

75

R2

G5

Natrosol L

75 – 150

At 5 %

75

R3

G5

Natrosol HHX

3500-5500

At 1 %

75

 

Table 3: Coating with different amounts of Natrosol-M.

Formulations

Coating Material

Amount used in

upper and lower shell (mg)

Code

Core Tablet

R4

G5

Natrosol M

50

R1

G5

Natrosol M

75

R5

G5

Natrosol M

100

 

Evaluation of press coated tablets:

The Press coated tablets were evaluated for thickness, hardness, weight variation, friability (Indian Pharmacopoeia)8,9 and drug content (British Pharmacopoeia) 10.

 

Table 4: Coating with different combinations of hydrophilic polymer (Natrosol M) and high viscosity polymer (Natrosol-HHX).

Formulations

 

Coating Material

(75 mg)

 

Ratio %

Code

Core Tablet

R1

G5

Natrosol M: Natrosol HHX

100 : 0

R6

G5

Natrosol M : Natrosol HHX

75 : 25

R7

G5

Natrosol M: Natrosol HHX

50 : 50

R8

G5

Natrosol M: Natrosol HHX

25 : 75

R3

G5

Natrosol M: Natrosol HHX

0 : 100

 

Table 5: Coating with different combinations of hydrophilic polymer (Natrosol M) and low viscosity polymer (Natrosol-L).

Formulations

 

Coating Material

(75 mg)

 

Ratio %

Code

Core Tablet

R1

G5

Natrosol M: Natrosol L

100 : 0

R9

G5

Natrosol M: Natrosol L

75 : 25

R10

G5

Natrosol M: Natrosol L

50 : 50

R11

G5

Natrosol M: Natrosol L

25 : 75

R2

G5

Natrosol M: Natrosol L

0 : 100

 

 

In vitro release Study:

The test was carried out in a USP dissolution basket apparatus (Model-DT 60, Veego, India) at 100 rpm and 37° ± 0.5 °C. In vitro drug release studies of press coated tablets were done with changing media (i.e. in 0.1N HCl for 2 hrs, pH 6.8 phosphate buffer for next 4 hrs and finally in pH 7.4 phosphate buffer) in order to relate it to mouth to colon transit time and change in pH conditions. Aliquots (10 ml) of dissolution fluid were removed every hour, filtered and assayed for the amount of prednisolone released by a spectrophotometer at a wavelength of 248.0 nm. All the dissolution studies were performed in triplicate to obtain mean and standard deviation.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:

Phase solubility analysis of Prednisolone with HP β-CD:

Prednisolone is a very slightly soluble drug or poorly water soluble drug. The intrinsic solubility of prednisolone was found to be 0.49.This is similar to the reported solubility (0.49 mg/ml).The intrinsic solubility of Prednisolone was 0.49 mg/ml at 37oC in distilled water 5.The solubility increased in presence of HP β-CD.

 

Figure 1: Phase solubility diagram of Prednisolone in 0.00-0.009 mol L–1 HP β-CD aqueous solution.

 

The phase solubility diagram is shown in figure 1.The phase solubility diagram can be classified as AL type. The linear regression analysis gave slope=0.553, intercept=0.0013 and r2=0.9965.The slope (0.553) indicates formation of 1:2 (Drug: HP β-CD) complex. Solubility constant obtained from the data is 958.68 M–1.  This is similar to reported solubility constant (960 M–1)3.    Prednisolone-HP β-CD interactions in solution were concluded by taking Infrared spectra of Prednisolone, HP β-CD and physical mixture. Infrared spectra of Prednisolone, HP β-CD and physical mixture are given in Figure No.2, 3 and 4 respectively.

 

Figure 2: IR Spectrum of Prednisolone.

 

Figure 3: Infrared spectrum of HP β-CD.

 

Figure 4: Infrared spectrum of Prednisolone-HP β-CD Physical Mixture.

 

It was observed that FT-IR spectra of HP β-CD and physical mixture have similarity, physical mixture gives two new peaks at 1650(-C=O stretching (Diketone)).so the finding indicates that that prednisolone having C=O (Diketone) may be interaction with HP β-CD.

Evaluation of core and press tablets:

All core and press coated tablets showed uniform thickness. Percent of drug content was more than 97 %. The percent friability values for all the formulations were below  1% indicating that the friability was within the prescribed limits. All core and press coated tablets showed acceptable hardness.

 

Dissolution of core tablets:

The Prednisolone core tablets were designed for faster disintegration and dissolution. Effect of Ac-Di-Sol level on drug release from core tablets (formulations G1 to G5) was determined. Drug release profile is given in Figure 5.

 

Figure 5: Effect of Ac-Di-Sol® level on drug release profile from core tablets (G1 to G5).

 

Formulation G1 showed delayed drug release as it did not contain Ac-Di-Sol and Hydroxypropyl β-Cyclodextrin (Figure). Formulations G2 to G5 showed faster drug release because of presence of HP β-CD and Ac-Di-Sol. Ac-Di-Sol helps in disintegration of tablets and HP β-CD helps in solubilization of prednisolone. Formulations G3, G4 and G5 showed complete release of drug in nine minutes. Formulation G5 was chosen for further studies because G5 showed faster initial drug release as compared to initial drug release from G3 and G4.

 

v  Effect of Natrosol (hydroxyethylcellulose) viscosity grades on drug release from the press-coated tablet:

Press-coated tablets were prepared by altering the Natrosol viscosity grades of the outer layer and their dissolution behaviors were determined. Dissolution data for effect of different hydroxyethylcellulose viscosity grades (Natrosol L, M, and HHX) on drug release from the press-coated tablet is given in Figure 6. The lag time increased in the order of Natrosol HHX > Natrosol M > Natrosol L as increasing viscosity grades of Natrosol 11.

 

Figure 6: Effect of polymer viscosity on drug release from the press coated tablet.

 

R1- Natrosol-M (75 mg)

R2- Natrosol-L (75 mg)

R3- Natrosol-HHX (75 mg)

 

Formulation R2 (Natrosol-L coated tablet) showed lag time of 2 hrs because NATROSOL-L is low viscosity (75 cps) erodible polymer. When tablet comes in contact with dissolution medium surface erosion take place. So dissolution medium penetrates into core composition very easily. This lead to rapid drug release after 2 hrs.

 

Formulation R1 (Natrosol-M coated tablet) showed lag time of 5.5 hrs because NATROSOL-M is medium viscosity (1500cps) polymer. When tablet comes in contact with dissolution medium, loose gel structure is formed. Dissolution medium penetrates into core composition and hydrates inner core. When internal pressure builds up to break the outer coating layer, rapid drug release is observed. So after lag time of 5.5 hrs, maximum drug release occurred within next 3 hrs.

 

Formulation R3 (Natrosol-HHX coated tablet) showed lag time of 9.5 hrs because Natrosol-HHX is higher viscosity (3500cps) swellable polymer. When tablet comes in contact with dissolution medium, tight gelled structure of the outer coating layer is formed. So penetration of dissolution medium into core composition requires more time to hydrate core composition. This lead to higher lag time of 9.5 hrs and very slow drug release after 9.5 hrs.

 

v  Effect of outer layer thickness on drug release from the press coated tablet.

By increasing the outer shell thickness, the lag time was prolonged, since the time required for complete the dissolution of the outer shell would be longer11, 12. Therefore, press-coated tablets were prepared with different amounts of Natrosol-M in the outer layer. Effect of outer layer weight on drug release from the press coated tablet is shown in Figure 7.

 

Figure 7: Effect of outer layer thickness on drug release from the press coated tablet.

 

R1 - Natrosol-M (75 mg)

R4- Natrosol-M (50 mg)

R5 - Natrosol-M (100 mg)

 

Figure 4 indicates that R4 (50mg), R1 (75mg), and R5 (100 mg) with increasing coating thickness showed increased lag time of 3, 5.5 and 6 hrs respectively. Higher coating weight lead to increased lag time. A large amount of coating material produced thicker tablets. This means longer path for water to penetrate into the core composition and drug to diffuse across the swelled layer.

 

v  Effect of high viscosity gellable polymer (Natrosol-HHX) combined with hydrophilic polymer (Natrosol-M) in the outer coating layer.

The lag time and drug release profiles of Prednisolone from press-coated tablets using different weight ratio of Natrosol-HHX: Natrosol-M is given in Figure 8.

 

Figure 8: Effect of high viscosity gellable polymer (Natrosol-HHX) combined with hydrophilic polymer (Natrosol-M) in the outer coating layer.

 

R6- N-M: N-HHX (75:25)

R7- N-M: N-HHX (50:50)

R8-N- M: N-HHX (25:75)

R3-N- M: N-HHX (0:100)

 

Figure 8 indicated that as the percentage of high viscosity polymer (Natrosol HHX) increased from 0 % to 100%, lag time increased from 5.5 hrs to 9.5 hrs. It was also observed that rate of drug release after lag time was also decreased with increase in proportion of high viscosity polymer. This behavior may be because of tight gel formation with high viscosity polymer (Natrosol-HHX).

 

v  Effect of low viscosity polymer (Natrosol-L) combined with hydrophilic polymer (Natrosol-M) in the outer coating layer.

The lag time and drug release profiles of Prednisolone from press-coated tablets using different proportions of Natrosol-L: Natrosol-M is given in Figure 9.

 

Figure 9: Effect of low viscosity polymer (Natrosol-L) combined with hydrophilic polymer (Natrosol-M) in the outer coating layer.

 

R9- N- M: N-L (75:25)

R10- N- M: N-L (50:50)

R11- N- M: N-L (25:75)

R2- N-M: N-L (0:100)

 

Figure 9 indicated that formulations R9, R10, R11 and R2 showed decrease in lag time and increase in drug release with increase in concentration of Natrosol-L, Natrosol-M. Natrosol-L being low viscosity (75Cps) erodible polymer, when tablet containing Natrosol-L comes in contact with dissolution medium surface erosion may take place. This may lead to rapid breaking of coating layer. So, penetration of dissolution medium into core composition may be faster. So, enough internal pressure is produced to break the coating layer rapidly.  Therefore, rapid drug release was observed.

 

CONCLUSION:

Press-coated tablets utilized various viscosity grades of hydroxyethylcellulose (i.e.Natrosol-L, M and HHX) in coat. Dissolution of press coated tablets showed lag phase followed by drug release. Observed lag times were 2.5 hrs, 5.5 hrs and 9.5 hrs for Natrosol-L, Natrosol-M and Natrosol-HHX respectively. So by combining different viscosity grades of Natrosol, it is possible to obtain a time-lags between 2.5 to 9.5 hrs. Increase in weight of coating material (Natrosol-M), increased thickness of tablet and increased lag time. Combining of various viscosity grades of HEC (Natrosol-L, M and HHX) in coat gave range of lag times proportional to viscosity i.e. lower viscosity gave less time and higher viscosity gave more lag time. Formulations R1 gave lag time of 5.5 hrs and complete drug release within 2.5 hrs after lag time. This formulation is more suitable for transit (5.5-6.5 hrs) through stomach and small intestine and faster release of drug in colon.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:

Authors greatly acknowledge Naprod Life sciences Pvt.Ltd, Mumbai for providing gift sample of Prednisolone.They also acknowledge Signet chemical corporation, Mumbai for providing gift samples of Natrosol, Croscarmellose Sodium (Ac-Di-Sol®), microcrystalline cellulose (Avicel PH 101®) and magnesium stearate and Cadila Healthcare Ltd., Ahmedabad for providing the gift sample of Hydroxepropyl β-cyclodextrin.

 

REFERENCES:

1.        Basit A.W. Advances in Colonic Drug Delivery. Drugs. 2005; 65 (14): 1991-2007.

2.        Watts PJ and lllum L. Colonic Drug Delivery. Drug Dev Ind Pharm.1997; 23(9): 893-913.

3.        Okimoto K, Mitake M and Ohnishi N. Design and Evaluation of an Osmotic Pump Tablet (OPT) for Prednisolone, a poorly water soluble drug  Using (SBE)7m-β CD.1998; Pharmaceutical research;15(10):1562-1568.

4.        Patel M, Shah A, Rathod S, and Parmar K. Preparation and characterization of Etoricoxib- β–cyclodextrin complexes prepared by the kneading method. Acta Pharm.2007; 57:351-359.

5.        Vogt M, Derendorf H., Shah V and Dressman J.B. Biowaiver monographs for immediate release solid oral dosage forms: Prednisolone. J. Pharm Sci. 2007; 96(1):27-37.

6.        Fukui E, Uemura K and Kobayashi M  Studies on Applicability of Press-Coated Tablets using Hydroxypropylcellulose (HPC) in the Outer Shell for Timed-Release Preparations J. Control. Release. 2000; 68: 215–223.

7.        Fukui E, Miyamura N, Kobayashi M. An in vitro investigation of the suitability of press-coated tablets with hydroxypropylmethylcellulose acetate succinate (HPMCAS) and hydrophobic additives in the outer shell for colon targeting.  J. Control Release 2001; 70: 97–107.

8.        The Theory and Practice of Industrial Pharmacy. Lachman L, Liberman H A and Kanig J L. Varghese Publishing house, Mumbai, 3rd Ed. 293-345.

9.        Indian Pharmacopoeia (IP), 1996, Vol-II: A-82-84.

10.     British States Pharmacopoeia (BP), 2008, Vol-II., J-Z 1801-1802.

11.     Wu B., Shun N. and Wei X. Characterization of 5-Fluorouracil release from Hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC) Compression coated tablets. Pharm. Dev.tech.2007; 12:203-210.

12.     Conte U, Maggi L, Torre ML, Giunchedi P. and Manna AL. Press-coated Tablets for Time Programmed Release of Drugs. Biomaterials. 1993; 14 (13): 1017-1023.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Received on 15.07.2010          Modified on 04.08.2010

Accepted on 11.08.2010         © RJPT All right reserved

Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 4(3): March 2011; Page 405-410